Character Counts! Evaluation Report
|
Gender |
|
Female |
57% |
Male |
43% |
|
|
Age |
|
14-15 yrs old |
40% |
16-17 yrs old |
53% |
18+ yrs old |
7% |
|
|
Race/Ethnicity |
|
American Indian |
2% |
Asian |
2% |
Black |
4% |
Hispanic |
2% |
White |
90% |
|
|
Length at Residence |
|
- 6 months |
7% |
6 months – 1 year |
3% |
1-2 years |
10% |
2-5 years |
22% |
5+ years |
58% |
|
|
# in Household |
|
2 people or less |
4% |
3-4 persons |
53% |
5-6 persons |
36% |
7-8 persons |
4% |
9+ persons |
3% |
|
|
Live With |
|
Both parents |
69% |
1 parent and 1 step parent |
25% |
Father |
1% |
Mother |
<1% |
Other |
4% |
Additional student information was collected about parents’ education level, students’ employment, and family interaction.
Fathers’ Education |
|
< High school |
7% |
High school graduate |
30% |
College – no degree |
9% |
College graduate |
45% |
Unknown |
9% |
|
|
Mothers’ Education |
|
< High school |
4% |
High school graduate |
27% |
College – no degree |
12% |
College graduate |
53% |
Unknown |
4% |
|
|
Evening meal together |
|
Not at all |
10% |
Once a week |
15% |
2-3 times per week |
31% |
4-5 times per week |
27% |
Every night of the week |
17% |
|
|
Student employment |
|
None |
46% |
< 10 hours |
22% |
10-20 hours |
21% |
20-40 hours |
9% |
40+ hours |
2% |
|
|
Chores |
|
None |
15% |
< 5 hours |
64% |
5-10 hours |
16% |
10-20 hours |
3% |
20+ hours |
2% |
|
|
Perceived family support |
|
Very supportive |
62% |
Fairly supportive |
30% |
Not very supportive |
5% |
Not supportive |
3% |
Students were asked to identify groups and activities that they are involved with attached to the school environment and outside of the school environment. Theoretically, the more activities students are involved in the less likely students are to engage in deviant or delinquent behavior.
Volunteered |
|
Not at all |
22% |
1 time |
23% |
2-5 times |
31% |
6-10 times |
11% |
10+ times |
13% |
|
|
# of school events (last month) |
|
None |
17% |
One |
9% |
Two |
11% |
Three |
10% |
Four + |
54% |
|
|
# of activities involved |
|
None |
18% |
One |
22% |
Two |
22% |
Three |
17% |
Four + |
21% |
|
|
Activities |
|
Varsity athletics |
23% |
Non-varsity athletics |
18% |
Language club |
3% |
Drama club |
4% |
Debate club |
<1% |
Boy or Girl Scouts |
5% |
Boys or Girls Club |
6% |
Pep or Spirit club |
5% |
SGA |
5% |
Cheerleading |
7% |
Religious Group |
23% |
4-H |
4% |
FFA |
5% |
Other |
20% |
Attitudinal Measures
These measures were taken in an attempt to determine the kinds of attitudes students hold in relation to the “Six Pillars of Character”. This information is important for several reasons. First, it can be used as one type of outcome data: student opinions and attitudes are being tracked continually from the initial survey and each additional survey is compared. Beginning with the first survey and tracking subsequent surveys, these measures may indicate possible successes of the program. Additionally, since the intent of the program is to increase pro-social behaviors by altering students’ knowledge and attitudes about good character, it is important to track changes in student attitudes as well as changes in student behaviors. The attitudinal measures can be split into three categories:
· Attitudes about the “Six Pillars of Character”: these questions address student beliefs about positive, pro-social behaviors, as defined by the “Six Pillars of Character”.
· Attitudes about the world: these questions address student perceptions of the world around them.
· Attitudes about parents: these questions address student perceptions of the ethical example set by their parents.
These questions are important because they allow for measurement of how well the CC! message is reaching students, and the degree to which they are internalizing that message. By comparing the measures of these attitudes with earlier and later measures of the same attitudes, it is possible to determine whether the presence of resource materials related to the “Six Pillars of Character” is changing student attitudes about character.
These measures were accomplished by asking students to rank their level of agreement to individual statements. These statements consisted of hypothetical situations where the “Six Pillars of Character” could be applied while making a decision about a question involving a moral or ethical choice.
The following tables present the results of students’ survey responses. Two numbers are presented in each cell of the table: Brandon Valley High School 2005 percentages and in parentheses, the baseline percentages for the State gathered in 1998.
*(Percentages have been rounded and may not add to one hundred percent for each question.)
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Unsure |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
Sometimes its okay to respond to an insult with force |
23% (25) |
36% (33) |
15% (19) |
20% (8) |
6% (15) |
It’s okay to lie or cheat if it’s to avoid unfair consequences |
16% (20) |
35% (34) |
25% (27) |
19% (7) |
4% (12) |
It’s okay to lie on an application for a good job |
39% (41) |
42% (39) |
8% (12) |
7% (3) |
3% (5) |
It’s okay to use people as long as they aren’t hurt |
27% (33) |
41% (40) |
18% (15) |
10% (5) |
3% (7) |
It’s okay to do whatever it takes to succeed if no one is hurt |
11% (10) |
28% (23) |
21% (20) |
31% (15) |
9% (32) |
Student’s Views about the World
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Unsure |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
In today’s world, people often must lie or cheat to succeed |
14% (17) |
29% (29) |
23% (23) |
28% (9) |
6% (22) |
People who cheat are more likely to succeed |
30% (12) |
42% (28) |
17% (43) |
9% (7) |
2% (10) |
There is no moral responsibility to help other people |
31% (22) |
37% (29) |
25% (36) |
4% (5) |
2% (8) |
On a practical, real life basis honesty is the best policy |
4% (4) |
7% (7) |
15% (14) |
46% (36) |
29% (39) |
When I see something wrong I should try to do something |
4% (4) |
9% (10) |
19% (21) |
50% (22) |
17% (43) |
People should do the right thing even if not in their best interest |
4% (4) |
6% (7) |
15% (15) |
51% (33) |
24% (41) |
Student’s Views about their Parents
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Unsure |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
My parents set a high example of honesty and ethics |
6% (5) |
10% (7) |
17% (17) |
41% (34) |
25% (37) |
These measures focus on the actual behaviors and attitudes that the CC! framework aims to change. Students were asked to indicate the number of times they had engaged in various behaviors in the preceding six months. These behaviors relate closely to pro-social behaviors encouraged through the resources and materials used in the “Six Pillars of Character”. This information is important because one of the primary goals of the CC! framework is to bring about real behavioral changes in youth. Measurements can be examined to compare baseline data with year six.
The behavioral measures can be broken into several categories:
¨ Behavior toward rules: these measures focus on the students’ behavior related to the rules of school.
¨ Behavior toward others: these items deal with the way students treat other people.
¨ Illegal behaviors: these items deal with behaviors that are considered illegal.
¨ Positive behaviors: items dealing with behaviors that the program hopes to increase, rather than decrease, would fit into this category.
¨ Parental behaviors: these items deal with the students’ reported behavior of their parents in various areas related to the “Six Pillars of Character”.
In the past 6 months, I have: |
Not at all |
1 time |
2-5 times |
6-10 times |
11+ times |
Cheated on an exam or quiz |
40% (43) |
22% (21) |
24% (24) |
5% (4) |
9% (8) |
Let someone copy my work |
17% (16) |
16% (17) |
33% (33) |
12% (12) |
22% (22) |
Was late for class without a legitimate excuse |
57% (55) |
17% (17) |
15% (17) |
4% (4) |
6% (7) |
Missed class without a legitimate excuse |
85% (77) |
7% (8) |
4% (8) |
2% (3) |
6% (4) |
Received detention or suspension |
70% (61) |
13% (17) |
10% (13) |
3% (3) |
3% (6) |
Failed to get my schoolwork done on time |
19% (20) |
22% (21) |
32% (29) |
10% (11) |
18% (19) |
* Brandon Valley High School 2005 data in percents, State baseline from 1998 presented in parentheses. Percentages have been rounded and may not add to one hundred.
Behavior toward Others
In the past 6 months, I have: |
Not at all |
1 time |
2-5 times |
6-10 times |
11+ times |
Used physical force against someone |
54% (51) |
18% (22) |
17% (16) |
5% (4) |
6% (7) |
Told a lie to a parent |
14% (17) |
20% (26) |
29% (30) |
11% (11) |
26% (16) |
Told a lie to a teacher |
40% (48) |
20% (22) |
22% (16) |
8% (5) |
10% (8) |
Teased someone because of race or ethnicity |
77% (80) |
9% (10) |
8% (5) |
2% (1) |
5% (4) |
Broke a promise to someone |
20% (26) |
26% (24) |
36% (34) |
9% (7) |
9% (9) |
Borrowed money without repaying it |
52% (50) |
23% (27) |
17% (15) |
3% (3) |
4% (5) |
Was teased by someone because of race or ethnicity |
78% (78) |
7% (9) |
7% (7) |
2% (2) |
7% (4) |
In the past 6 months, I have: |
Not at all |
1 time |
2-5 times |
6-10 times |
11+ times |
Drank alcoholic beverages |
45% (52) |
13% (14) |
17% (14) |
7% (5) |
18% (15) |
Used an illegal drug |
73% (78) |
8% (6) |
6% (4) |
3% (2) |
11% (10) |
Used a fake ID |
92% (91) |
3% (4) |
2% (2) |
1% (1) |
3% (2) |
Defaced or vandalized property |
76% (74) |
12% (13) |
7% (7) |
2% (2) |
3% (4) |
Broke into another’s property |
88% (88) |
5% (7) |
3% (2) |
2% (1) |
2% (2) |
Took something without paying |
68% (65) |
13% (17) |
9% (10) |
3% (2) |
7% (6) |
Desirable Behaviors
In the past 6 months, I have engaged in these activities: |
Not at all |
1 time |
2-5 times |
6-10 times |
11+ times |
Helped someone study for an exam or do homework |
10% (12) |
13% (18) |
37% (34) |
16% (15) |
24% (21) |
Told the truth though it might get me into trouble |
12% (16) |
22% (27) |
40% (33) |
13% (11) |
14% (13) |
In the past 6 months, I have done these things: |
Not at all |
1 time |
2-5 times |
6-10 times |
11+ times |
Was lied to by a parent |
46% (55) |
21% (22) |
20% (14) |
6% (3) |
7% (6) |
Discovered my parent doing something dishonest |
65% (74) |
15% (14) |
14% (7) |
2% (2) |
4% (3) |
Had a parent break a promise to me |
41% (49) |
23% (27) |
20% (15) |
7% (3) |
9% (6) |
Exposure to CC!
Determining the frequency students are exposed to the CC! framework as well as where students gain their information are important programmatic considerations. In the second year of the State survey, questions were added to determine the frequency and location of the CC! framework that students received. The assumption for Brandon Valley High School in 2005 is that students will not be familiar with the CC! framework and thus, will not respond with any frequency or locations.
Heard about CC! in School |
|
None |
51% |
1-2 Times |
33% |
3-5 Times |
10% |
6-10 Times |
4% |
+10 Times |
3% |
Heard about CC! from Parents |
|
None |
80% |
1-2 Times |
11% |
3-5 Times |
5% |
6-10 Times |
2% |
+10 Times |
3% |
Heard about CC! in the Community |
|
None |
76% |
1-2 Times |
17% |
3-5 Times |
2% |
6-10 Times |
3% |
+10 Times |
2% |
Location of CC! Message |
|
4-H |
5% |
Religious group |
14% |
Business/employer |
5% |
Boys/Girls Club/Scouts |
1% |
Sports |
7% |
Media |
9% |
Signs |
8% |
Police officer |
4% |
School Counselor |
11% |
Special Event |
6% |
Summary
Overall, Brandon Valley High School results for fall 2005, are similar to the results of the State’s baseline data. Alcohol consumption, drug usage, honesty, and parental role modeling are areas where Brandon Valley students responded slightly lower than the State averages from 1998. Attitudes and behaviors associated with these topics may present growth opportunities for students, parents, school administrators and staff, and the community in the following year.